The famous speaker who no one had heard of said: > Sorry, I am new to this mailing list. <rant> Please, Please people, trim your quotes. The following was way too long for an 8-word responce as shown above. Nothing bothers me more than to have to read 3 entire messages above someone's 1-line reply. I very nearly gave up on this one, but read on just so I could post this rant. I know this has been said many times before, but I feel it necessary to repeat in this situation, as this is actually the second message in a row on this thread that could have used a post like this one. </rant> PRINCE > M.Hockings wrote: > > >On Sat, 2004-02-07 at 15:58, Alexander Dalloz wrote: > > > >>>Am Sa, den 07.02.2004 schrieb Chris um 22:52: > >>> > >>> > >>>>Can any one recommend a good one? > >>>> > >>>>it has to be able to detect windows viruses as well > >>>> > >>>>-- > >>>>Chris. > >>>> > >>> > >>>Why don't you search this list's archive? > >>> > >>>clamav is ok, f-prot is free for private use too, uvscan by McAfee/NAI > >>>works good too. > >>> > >>>Alexander > >>> > >>> > >>>-- > >>>Alexander Dalloz | Enger, Germany | GPG key 1024D/ED695653 1999-07-13 > >>>Fedora GNU/Linux Core 1 (Yarrow) on Athlon CPU kernel > >>>2.4.22-1.2149.nptl > >>>Sirendipity 22:57:19 up 7 days, 21:57, load average: 0.50, 0.30, > >>>0.19 [ ?????????? ??'?????????? - gnothi seauton ] > >>> > >>> > >>> > >>>Brian Connolly wrote: > >>> > >>>"Why don't you search this list's archive?" > >>> > >>>Alexander, > >>> > >>>Will you please stop your bitching. It's getting really annoying. I > >>>recommend you either help people or don't. Enough with the > >>>grade-school > >>>reprimands for various infractions of "the rules". I've never followed > >>>them; not about to start now. So stop already. > >>> > >>>Regards, > >>> > >>>Brian Connolly > >> > >> > > > >Hmmm, Seems to me that Alexander did both. That is, he pointed out a > >number of virus scanners that run on Linux and indicated that more > >information could be obtained by searching the archives. AV scanners > >for Linux have been discussed through several threads and Chris could > >obtain more information from them than a long regurgitation from > >Alexander (or others). > > > >Mike > > > >
Attachment:
pgpiwgqNMS5tG.pgp
Description: PGP signature
