Bart Martens wrote:
No, "testing" is not the place for security updates. When the security
updates are released for rh9, the security updates for fc1 should
already have gone through "testing", and be released to the public.
I know , but I still believe that security updates have to be tested just as all the other packages , as they may also break something , specially if you think about how they're made: in a rush , trying to solve the issue as fast as possible.... I know that programming in that conditions can lead to some problems...
-- Pedro Macedo
