Re: Is there anything cheaper than VMWare that runs Win2k?

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Wed, Jan 28, 2004 at 09:22:55AM -0800, Preston Crawford wrote:
> This talk about adding Win2k lately has me thinking. I really hate
> dual-booting. Mostly because I hate leaving Linux since that's where my
> mail/irc/mp3s, etc. are. So I was wondering. Is there a virtualization
> package out there (that works relatively well) that's cheaper than
> VMWare and still runs Win2k. I ask that because I'm trying to get a
> platform to run ASP.NET on (I'm using Mono currently, but it has issues)
> and as far as I know I need at least Win2k for that. Last time I checked
> Win4Lin only supported up to Windows ME. What else is there that works?
> 
> Preston

There is "bochs" which runs nearly anything. Slow, but nearly anything.

http://bochs.sourceforge.net

-- 
Gregory G. "Wolfe" Woodbury      `-_-'    Owner/Admin: wolves.durham.nc.us
ggw at wolves.durham.nc.us         U     RHCT August 2003
"The Line Eater is a boojum snark."     Hug your wolf.




[Index of Archives]     [Current Fedora Users]     [Fedora Desktop]     [Fedora SELinux]     [Yosemite News]     [Yosemite Photos]     [KDE Users]     [Fedora Tools]     [Fedora Docs]

  Powered by Linux