On Tue, Jan 27, 2004 at 02:23:32PM -0700, Preston Crawford wrote: > > > > Since it's unlikely you will be installing .NET on a non-XP system the gymnastics > > > > of mapping the drives shouln't be needed. I currently run a dual boot system with > > > > WindowsXP running on the secondary drive. Works fine. > > > > > > > > John V. Pope > > > > > > Why do you say that? Win2k runs it fine, right? I'd prefer 2K, personally. > > > > Win2K, WinXP, same-same as far as running from the secondary drive. > > > > John V. Pope > > Okay, that's what I thought. What did you mean about the "unlikely to be installing .NET on a non-XP system" part? As far as I understand it, .NET, ASP.NET, etc. installs just as well on Win2k as it does on XP. Thus Win2k would work fine. By non-XP I meant Win95/98/Me (DOS boot types) that can't install .NET (AFAIK). Sorry for the confusion. John V. Pope
