-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 On Monday 26 January 2004 19:58, Peter Eddy wrote: > Think the opposite about what? I don't know about candy-coatedness, > that seems to me to be just a 'theme' issue. Either environment can be > pretty much as plain or as out there as you like. But KDE has always Yes, both are themable to be how you like, as you say its not really the problem. Then what is? ....... > struck me as more polished, more useful, and less buggy. And I really > like Konqueror (the file system browser, web browser, etc.) If it > weren't for it, I'd probably use XFCE or WindowMaker. Same here: when I try Gnome its *Nautilus* that makes me want to get rid of it. Gnome itself is okay, the widgets, applets are okay... the whole thing is usuable and fine... except its *Nautilus* that compares very badly in my opinion with Konqueror. Maybe its my usage pattern, but within a few minutes I manage to make it unbearably slow. Open an image directory and it turns to treacle as it parses the images for thumbnails -- did that last week on my stepson's laptop. Open many instances and it becomes treacly too -- this is from some time ago. If other people have the same experience, it may not be anti-gnome feeling out there but anti-Nautilus feeling! - -Andy - -- Find your answer without waiting for replies.... Searchable list archives at http://marc.theaimsgroup.com/?l=fedora-list&r=1&w=2 -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.2.3 (GNU/Linux) iD8DBQFAFXRSjKeDCxMJCTIRAtYLAJ4+05f6bGTS5FQWs1cKx93PLC2hEgCdFwYt X6wBJvzHRo+WkBdy+7gpXpU= =ztEl -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
