On Tue, 2004-01-20 at 18:43, William Hooper wrote: > Rui Miguel Seabra said: > > On Tue, 2004-01-20 at 17:34, William Hooper wrote: > >> Rui Miguel Seabra said: > >> > The problem is that that limitation of the Service Agreement might be > >> of > >> > bad faith in light of the spirit of the license of the software > >> they're > >> > redistributing. > >> > >> The service agreement has nothing to to with the license. You are about > >> to do anything with the software within it's license agreement. The > > > > <sarcasm>Really? Who would guess?</sarcasm> > > > > Contract law (the service agreement) has _nothing_ to do with copyright > > law, but a contract that has clauses limiting rights granted by the real > > authors of software might not be seen as good faith (I don't see it as > > good faith. Legal, yes, honorable, not really). > > And entering the service agreement with the intent to violate it's terms > is in good faith? oh, at least I don't plan to _ever_ use RHN. Please notice that my company would gladly pay 1000 EUR every year for a timely access to the updates per version of RedHat that we need. Just not and never 1800 EUR per seat (yes, that's the price here). I don't require tech support, and the updates are a matter of easy our job. If we have to do it in a harder way, we will. Rui. -- + No matter how much you do, you never do enough -- unknown + Whatever you do will be insignificant, | but it is very important that you do it -- Gandhi + So let's do it...? Please AVOID sending me WORD, EXCEL or POWERPOINT attachments. See http://www.fsf.org/philosophy/no-word-attachments.html
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part
