Re: Whitebox Linux

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



From: "William Hooper" <whooperhsd3@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>

>
> Ow Mun Heng said:
> >
> >
> >> -----Original Message-----
> >> From: Benjamin J. Weiss [mailto:benjamin@xxxxxxxxxx]
> >
> >> > > But as long as there are SRPMS there can be community support.
> >
> > Yeah since The EULA & Linux's GPL states that it need to be
> > given back to the community. SRPMS has been provided and updated.
>
> The GPL states that the source needs to be given to people that have been
> given the binaries.  It says nothing about having to give to source out to
> people that you haven't given the binaries.
>
> > I reckon that updates can be performed using yum/apt/up2date
> > and since I know DAG Wieers provides updates..
>
> Dag doesn't supply any Red Hat errata (for RHL, FC, or RHEL).
>
> --
> William Hooper

I just wanted to point out that somebody mis-quoted here.  *I* never said
either of those quotes, though I'm sure that I was somewhere in that thread.

Ben




[Index of Archives]     [Current Fedora Users]     [Fedora Desktop]     [Fedora SELinux]     [Yosemite News]     [Yosemite Photos]     [KDE Users]     [Fedora Tools]     [Fedora Docs]

  Powered by Linux