On Tue, 20 Jan 2004, Jason Dixon wrote: > On Tue, 2004-01-20 at 02:32, Ow Mun Heng wrote: > > > > > The point being made is that if you find a bug in Whitebox > > > Linux, and that bug doesn't get fixed in a RHEL update, and the Whitebox > > > > maintainers can't fix it, Red Hat has no obligation to fix that bug. > > > > True, however, your statement is a bit conflicting. if I find a bug in > > whitebox and that bug is also found in RHEL, then RH will be obligated to > > get it fixed. The only question is _IF_ the bug is only in whitebox and not > > in RHEL. Then what happens? > > I can't imagine how the WBEL team could introduce a bug, as they don't > introduce any new code into the distro. Whitebox is literally a rebuild They've already encountered several bugs/issues/oddities caused by building in different enviroment than RHEL was built (RH has their own buildsystem which isn't publicly available at least currently). - Panu -
