Jeff Iddings wrote: > Tao wenqiang wrote: > > Hans Deragon wrote: > >> Mozilla 1.6 has been released. Can we expect RPMs for FC1 and RHL 9? > > just dowenload install file or tarball and intall youself,it works fine. > Well, if that's not bad advice, I don't know what is. What's the point > of having a package system if you're going to suggest people download > tarballs and install them to who knows where. Nevermind the fact that if > that application is found to have an issue... yum, apt, etc won't > automatically update it. This could compermise the integrity of their > system. And not to mention it's just messy. Oh.. and who cares if it's > not built against your system's libs? I'm sure that wouldn't effect > anything at all. :P > I'm certain there will be Mozilla 1.6 RPMS, either from Fedora or Dag in > the next few hours/days. Don't be so damn impatient. Or, do as those of us who install Mozilla daily or even more frequently for testing its development. Leave the RPM be, so what anything dependant on them is left undisturbed. Add a menu option, or replace the existing, and point them to your tarball installation. I put mine in /usr/local/mozilla16 and /usr/local/mozilla17. You might want to add an extra profile(s) for the newer version(s) -- "The object and practice of liberty lies in the limitation of governmental power." General Douglas MacArthur Team OS/2 ** Reg. Linux User #211409 Felix Miata *** http://members.ij.net/mrmazda/
