-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 On Thursday 15 January 2004 14:04, Rui Miguel Seabra wrote: > Some submarine Software Patents came up about some FAT extensions, as > long as they are not included, FAT can still be used. > > I've read somewhere that most flash'a-like memory cards don't > use/require these extensions, but don't believe me for I might be > completely wrong. My understanding matches yours Rui... the patents are about long filenames being supported by crapping over multiple sequential 8.3 filename slots IIRC. What a joke subject for a patent. MSFT have indicated thus far that they are only asking for royalties from OEMs which embed this support. Its an interesting question that Redhat have probably already asked their lawyers as to if VFAT in Linux should be yanked. - -Andy - -- Find your answer without waiting for replies.... Searchable list archives at http://marc.theaimsgroup.com/?l=fedora-list&r=1&w=2 -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.2.3 (GNU/Linux) iD8DBQFABqiJjKeDCxMJCTIRApgaAJ42jq2k+zyKS2h6CWP2As5gC0f4xwCfYorT OsV4QFNzTDLy8CUdGJK1A+k= =7tj9 -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
