Em Qua, 2004-01-14 às 12:04, Don Levey escreveu: > > It's worth noting though that galeon-1.3.x which is what you'll get > > from Dag is a very different beast to galeon-1.2.x, which is my > > browser of choice on RH7 and RH9. IMO the 1.3 series has been > > seriously > > dumbed down, but more seriously is significantly slower. When I > > installed FC1 I compared galeon, mozilla, epiphany and firebird for > > features and speed. Galeon was by far the slowest, mozilla and > > firebird the fastest. Firebird looks like it's going to be really > > good, but isn't quite yet, so I'm using mozilla. This is on a 700MHz > > laptop, so it's possible that speed variations will be insignificant > > on a modern, fast machine. > Thanks all for the info. It looks like, for the foreseeable future, she'll > be sticking with Mozilla, though I'll keep one or two more on her machine > anyway. Her main problem with Mozilla is that some websites (in particular, > one on which she liked to go shopping) were "broken" and didn't render > correctly. Hmm... Maybe this is not a bad thing... There are several websites not correctly rendered by mozilla, and epyphany should show same results - in fact, the rendering engine is the same. Although I don't use it everyday (as I'm a Gnome fan), Konqueror works with most of the sites mozilla can't handle. Khtml sees quite good, and even apple abandoned Internet Explorer in favor of their own khtml-based browser... -- []s Alexandre Ganso 500 FOUR vermelha - Diretor Steel Goose Moto Group
