Hi! Is there anybody, who successfully installed an AVM Fritzcard ISDN adapter? The card is automatically detected on install as AVM A1 (although it is a AVM PCI). That's also what lspci shows: 00:0b.0 Network controller: AVM Audiovisuelles MKTG & Computer System GmbH A1 ISDN [Fritz] (rev 02) In redhat-config-network it's shown as /dev/eth1, not ippp0. Trying to active it I get: "Hisax Device eth1 not found"! So I deleted the card and reconfigured it, now my /etc/sysconfig/isdncard looks like this: RESOURCES='protocol=2 type=27 id=HiSax' NAME='AVM PCI (Fritz!PCI)' MODULE=hisax VENDOR_ID=1244 FIRMWARE= Now I get: "Dialing of ippp0 triggered", although the link is up, as /var/log/messages shows: Jan 13 17:39:28 hal9000 modprobe: modprobe: Can't locate module ippp0 Jan 13 17:39:30 hal9000 ifup-ippp: isdnctrl addif ippp0 Jan 13 17:39:30 hal9000 ifup-ippp: isdnctrl addphone ippp0 out 019102345 Jan 13 17:39:30 hal9000 ifup-ippp: isdnctrl l2_prot ippp0 hdlc Jan 13 17:39:30 hal9000 ifup-ippp: isdnctrl l3_prot ippp0 trans Jan 13 17:39:30 hal9000 ifup-ippp: isdnctrl encap ippp0 syncppp Jan 13 17:39:30 hal9000 ifup-ippp: isdnctrl dialmode ippp0 manual Jan 13 17:39:30 hal9000 ifup-ippp: isdnctrl secure ippp0 off Jan 13 17:39:30 hal9000 ifup-ippp: isdnctrl huptimeout ippp0 4600 Jan 13 17:39:30 hal9000 ifup-ippp: isdnctrl callback ippp0 off Jan 13 17:39:30 hal9000 ifup-ippp: isdnctrl pppbind ippp0 Jan 13 17:39:30 hal9000 ifup-ippp: ifconfig ippp0 0.0.0.0 pointopoint 0.0.0.0 up Jan 13 17:39:31 hal9000 ifup-ippp: ipppd 0.0.0.0:0.0.0.0 defaultroute deldefaultroute file /etc/ppp/ioption-secret-ippp0 ipparam GMXISDN ipcp-accept-local /dev/ippp0 ipcp-accept-remote -vj -vjccomp -ac -pc -bsdcomp noccp -chap ms-get-dns Jan 13 17:39:31 hal9000 ipppd[7029]: Found 1 device: Jan 13 17:39:31 hal9000 ipppd[7030]: ipppd i2.2.12 (isdn4linux version of pppd by MH) started Jan 13 17:39:31 hal9000 ipppd[7030]: init_unit: 0 Jan 13 17:39:31 hal9000 ipppd[7030]: Connect[0]: /dev/ippp0, fd: 19 Jan 13 17:39:33 hal9000 kernel: ippp0: dialing 1 019102345... Jan 13 17:39:34 hal9000 kernel: isdn_net: ippp0 connected Jan 13 17:39:34 hal9000 ipppd[7030]: Local number: , Remote number: 019102345, Type: outgoing Jan 13 17:39:34 hal9000 ipppd[7030]: PHASE_WAIT -> PHASE_ESTABLISHED, ifunit: 0, linkunit: 0, fd: 19 Jan 13 17:39:34 hal9000 ipppd[7030]: ioctl(SIOCSIFMTU): Invalid argument, 18 ippp0 1524. ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^ ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^ ??? Jan 13 17:39:34 hal9000 ipppd[7030]: Remote message: Jan 13 17:39:34 hal9000 ipppd[7030]: MPPP negotiation, He: No We: No Jan 13 17:39:34 hal9000 ipppd[7030]: local IP address 62.155.165.169 Jan 13 17:39:34 hal9000 ipppd[7030]: remote IP address 193.158.139.213 Routing is ok, too: Ziel Router Genmask Flags Metric Ref Use Iface 192.168.1.0 * 255.255.255.0 U 0 0 0 eth0 169.254.0.0 * 255.255.0.0 U 0 0 0 usb0 193.0.0.0 * 255.0.0.0 U 0 0 0 ippp0 127.0.0.0 * 255.0.0.0 U 0 0 0 lo default 193.158.139.213 0.0.0.0 UG 0 0 0 ippp0 Both redhat-config-network and redhat-control-network don't realize the link, so I cannot deactivate it. /sbin/ifdown ippp0 works: Jan 13 17:41:04 hal9000 kernel: isdn_net: local hangup ippp0 Jan 13 17:41:04 hal9000 kernel: ippp0: Chargesum is 0 Jan 13 17:41:04 hal9000 ipppd[7030]: Modem hangup Jan 13 17:41:04 hal9000 ipppd[7030]: Connection terminated. Jan 13 17:41:04 hal9000 ipppd[7030]: taking down PHASE_DEAD link 0, linkunit: 0 Jan 13 17:41:04 hal9000 ipppd[7030]: closing fd 19 from unit 0 Jan 13 17:41:04 hal9000 ipppd[7030]: link 0 closed , linkunit: 0 Jan 13 17:41:04 hal9000 ipppd[7030]: reinit_unit: 0 Jan 13 17:41:04 hal9000 ipppd[7030]: Connect[0]: /dev/ippp0, fd: 19 ^^^^^^^^^^ ??? But after that I loose my network, for there was a new default route added and deleted again, so there is no default route anymore. Ziel Router Genmask Flags Metric Ref Use Iface 192.168.1.0 * 255.255.255.0 U 0 0 0 eth0 169.254.0.0 * 255.255.0.0 U 0 0 0 usb0 127.0.0.0 * 255.0.0.0 U 0 0 0 lo So I have to /etc/init.d/network restart, to get my default route back again. In the testing-times I had some of the problems, too, but I was able to solve them. See http://www.redhat.com/archives/fedora-test-list/2003-September/msg01640.html So is there anybody who has no problems with this card? Christoph