On Tue, 2004-01-13 at 16:10, Steven Stern wrote: > On 13 Jan 2004 16:00:19 +0100, Tarjei Knapstad <tarjeik@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > > >On Tue, 2004-01-13 at 14:08, David C. Hart wrote: > >> On Tue, 2004-01-13 at 07:30, Mark wrote: > >> > Yes and currently testing it. Seems like a good distro so far. > >> > > >> > On Tue, 2004-01-13 at 06:16, WipeOut wrote: > >> > > Has anyone taken a look at www.whiteboxlinux.org ?? > >> > > > >> > > Its basically RHEL 3 recompiled from the src.rpms. No price, No restrictions.. > >> > > > >> Fedora looks more current. Is there anything in WB that is not in FC1? > > > >That's not the point. WhiteBox is a rebuild of the RHEL3 distro and has > >nothing to do with Fedora (except the fact that RHEL3 is based off FC1). > >WhiteBox is a free alternative for your servers, not an alternative to > >Fedora. > > > > How about typing "/sbin/service"? Errr..what's that got to do with anything? Are you trolling? -- Tarjei
