Bevin, Michael, Thanks very much. Makes perfect sense. Best, Adam Kosmin Michael Kearey (mutk@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx) wrote: " Adam Kosmin wrote: " >Hello everyone, " > " >I'm looking at my pam configuration and noticed something odd in " >/etc/pam.d/other " > " >Each line contains a reference to a path that does not exist. For " >example: " > " >auth required /lib/security/$ISA/pam_deny.so " > " >My filesystem does not contain a directory path of /lib/security/$ISA so " >I can't help but become curious. " " I am not entirely sure, but this is a variable that may be set for " different paths to the pam modules. Maybe for different archs ? ie 32 " and 64 bit varieties of pam modules. " " I googled and found a reference and it seems the $ISA is for this " purpose... " " Cheers, " Michael " " " " -- " fedora-list mailing list " fedora-list@xxxxxxxxxx " To unsubscribe: http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-list " -- "Yes, Your Honor. Now, where we are so far, in at least my line of reasoning, is I want to walk the Court through enough of our complaint to help the Court understand that IBM clearly did contribute a lot of the Unix-related information into Linux. We just don't know what it is." -- Kevin McBride SCO vs. IBM 12/05/03
