Hi Bjorn, On Mon, 2004-01-12 at 19:28, Bjorn Andersen wrote: > 1) Kernel messages was confusing, and unnecessary. Did you not have graphical boot? I think it is turned on by default. > 2) The âSystem Settingsâ and âSystem Toolsâ was available, but of no > use. (I sysadmin need a menu editor) I agree that these menus, with such similar names, might seem confusing to a beginner. However, could you think of another name combination for these menus? I think many would like to hear the opinions of your "test subjects" on this after you explain to them what those two collection of items are! > Some reactions was that it looked like DOS, and that is NOT god PR. :-) I usually answer that DOS is like the cro-magnon and a typical unix shell like bash is like the modern homo-sapiens. They might look similar, but the differences are not only in the look, the intelligence is far... far more developed. Hugs, Rui ps: thanks for publishing some of your data -- + No matter how much you do, you never do enough -- unknown + Whatever you do will be insignificant, | but it is very important that you do it -- Gandhi + So let's do it...? Please AVOID sending me WORD, EXCEL or POWERPOINT attachments. See http://www.fsf.org/philosophy/no-word-attachments.html
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part
