RE: Blank password works for root (Fixed!)

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



> [mailto:fedora-list-admin@xxxxxxxxxx]On Behalf Of Bevan C. Bennett
> Sent: Friday, January 09, 2004 4:01 PM
> To: fedora-list@xxxxxxxxxx
> Subject: Re: Blank password works for root
>
>
> Bill Beeman wrote:
> >
> > Comes from pam_smb-1.1.7-2
>
> Ah! I'd missed that one.
>
> >>* What changes if you remove the pam_smb_auth line? Do you
> still have
> >>null access? Do you still have access using the password?
> >>
> >
> > Commenting out the pam_smb_auth line fixes the immediate
> problem.  No
> > null access, and can log in with the root password.  So perhaps
> > somewhere in the Samba system?  I'm a relative newbie here and don't
> > quite know where to look next.  The offending machine is an
> upgrade from
> > RH9.  The samba server is still an RH9 box, and is running
> Samba 2.2.8a.
>
> There's a lot of scary sounding stuff in
> /usr/share/doc/pam_smb-1.1.7/README, particularly regarding
> the use of
> 'nolocal' to turn off local password file checks. I suspect that your
> samba server is somehow offering an unpassworded 'root' account.
>
> > I really appreciate the help.
>
> No problem. When things slow down it's been good to keep my debugging
> skills fired up. :)
>

Success!

I couldn't find anything in the setup on the samba server that seemed
obvious, recall that the server was a RH9 box running Samba 2.28a, while
the FC1 box was running Samba-common and Samba-client 3.0.0-15.  I
decided to upgrade the server to 3.0.1-2, and the problem vanished.  So
there was something between the versions.  I am almost positive that the
security hold did not exist before the FC1 upgrade to the client.

Many thanks to Bevan, and to all the rest that offered suggestions.

Bill





[Index of Archives]     [Current Fedora Users]     [Fedora Desktop]     [Fedora SELinux]     [Yosemite News]     [Yosemite Photos]     [KDE Users]     [Fedora Tools]     [Fedora Docs]

  Powered by Linux