On Fri, 2004-01-09 at 15:48, Lamar Owen wrote: > On Friday 09 January 2004 10:24 am, Rui Miguel Seabra wrote: > > On Fri, 2004-01-09 at 15:20, Lamar Owen wrote: > > > For those who don't follow fedora-devel, I would like to summarize what I > > > have found after making a proposal and requesting comments about a > > > mechanism to reduce the amount of bandwidth that is wasted downloading > > > updates. > > > You could summarize before having incited people to pester the > > fedora-devel-list, right? > > That was the summary. There has been backlash; demand needs to be > established. You want it, ask the developers. What's wrong with that > picture? A different definition of summary. You just said there's something you find useful (not explaining anything -- but I know what you want), but the people on fedora-devel-list don't seem inclined to do it, so go pester them. That's mongering, not summary, to me. Rui -- + No matter how much you do, you never do enough -- unknown + Whatever you do will be insignificant, | but it is very important that you do it -- Gandhi + So let's do it...? Please AVOID sending me WORD, EXCEL or POWERPOINT attachments. See http://www.fsf.org/philosophy/no-word-attachments.html
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part
