On Mon, 2004-01-05 at 09:58, Brian Fahrlander wrote: > On Mon, 2004-01-05 at 08:10, Wolfgang wrote: > > > In my previous post I meant U2, not UT2. (As I would have liked to see a > > U2 Linux Port) > > I was told that UT2 was an illusion- a name borrowed temporarily > until it was decided to call that product UT 2003. > > Now this U2? What the heck is that? Sorry by UT2 I mean UT 2003 (but UT2 is shorter :-) Kind regards, Mike
