Not sure I really understand this. The last entry from the changelog is from 12/15/03 and the announcement was posted on the 24th. So either there was a security related change introduced that is not documented or there was a about a week's worth of lag time between the change and publication. If the latter, perhaps the change was being tested? Adam Kosmin Tom Diehl (tdiehl@xxxxxxxxxxxx) wrote: " On Mon, 5 Jan 2004, Naoki wrote: " " > So I'm upgrading to the new kernel 2135. But I'd like to know where I " > can see the errata notes for this kernel so I can see what's changed. " > " > Where does errata for the updates live now? It's not at : " > http://www.redhat.com/apps/support/errata/ anymore. " " rpm -q --changelog kernel-whatever | less " " Tom " " " -- " fedora-list mailing list " fedora-list@xxxxxxxxxx " To unsubscribe: http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-list " -- "Yes, Your Honor. Now, where we are so far, in at least my line of reasoning, is I want to walk the Court through enough of our complaint to help the Court understand that IBM clearly did contribute a lot of the Unix-related information into Linux. We just don't know what it is." -- Kevin McBride SCO vs. IBM 12/05/03
