On Friday 02 January 2004 18:43, John Li wrote: > > Michael Schwendt wrote: > > First of all, why did you post this message as a reply to the > > thread called "Re: Printing Problems"? You did want to compose an > > entirely new > > message, didn't you? > > Correct, but I'm curious why this showed up as such a reply. I > picked an arbitrary message and used 'reply' in order to get the > email address (which I never remember) and to send the email from > the correct email address. However, I changed the subject line, > deleted all previous text, and changed the email format to > 'plain text'. The email I sent and received back from the > list has no reference that I can see to the thread called > "Re: Printing Problems". Did you put this comment in the wrong > email, or is there something I don't know about that is used > to track threads? > ==== The message you used as a starting point ======= Fri, 02 Jan 2004 14:08:10 -0700 From: "Ronald Hahm" <hahmr@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> To: <fedora-list@xxxxxxxxxx> Subject: Re: Printing Problems Message-ID: <000001c3d174$94619320$0901a8c0@HAHMPC9> ===== The message you sent =========== From: "John Li" <johnli@xxxxxxxx> To: <fedora-list@xxxxxxxxxx> Subject: Problem updating Mozilla with up2date X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook, Build 10.0.3416 In-Reply-To: <000001c3d174$94619320$0901a8c0@HAHMPC9> Note that the "In-Reply-To:" identifier is the same as the "Message-ID" in Ronald's message. This causes the mail client to group messages together. See: http://www.futzin.com/li.jpg for a display of what your message technique above does to mail clients which honor threading. Regards, Mike Klinke
