-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 On Sun, 28 Sep 2003 19:23:38 -0500, Mike Vanecek wrote: > If I read this exchange correctly, Fedora may not be a RH 10 equivalent for > those users of previous versions of RHL. Not a good sign?? [Recycling the reply I poste to redhat-list just a few minutes ago. Why the cross-post?] Can you explain this question a bit? No part of what you quoted gives a hint on what makes you think that "Fedore Core 1" will not be what was expected to become Red Hat Linux 10. Btw, this thread is about upgrading Shrike to Fedora Core release 0.94 (Severn). - -- -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.2.3 (GNU/Linux) iD8DBQE/d35G0iMVcrivHFQRAjtTAJ9cMrtrDvYszPUbp0ykMWAfi751pgCfc7m4 7u75cW+ye8NF/8pYofQa81s= =BOVV -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
