On Fri, 26 Sep 2003, Cristian Gafton wrote: > that. I have seen this called by some folks an "all or nothing" > policy - and the debate on its merits can go on ad nauseum. From > where we stand, there is a big difference in costs and effort > required to support a company with 5 servers compared to one with > 1000. We think it is fair to use that number of servers as an > indicator of how complex things will be for our support staff. IMHO its fair. The alternative, "pick and choose" would be /hell/ for RH, faced with customers who have a mix of machines which are and are not supported. regards, -- Paul Jakma paul@xxxxxxxx paul@xxxxxxxxx Key ID: 64A2FF6A warning: do not ever send email to spam@xxxxxxxxxx Fortune: He who renders warfare fatal to all engaged in it will be the greatest benefactor the world has yet known. -- Sir Richard Burton
