On Sat, 2003-10-11 at 14:08, Sean Middleditch wrote: > On Sat, 2003-10-11 at 15:25, Bill Anderson wrote: > > On Sat, 2003-10-11 at 11:48, Sean Middleditch wrote: > > > > > If you want to move forward, you need to go to Fedora. Fedora 1 will be > > > the exact same thing as Red Hat 10, except the logo/name/version will be > > > different. > > > > And OpenOffice 1.1 and Yum/Apt support, and GNOME 2.4 .... ;) > > Right. Which would've been in Red Hat Linux 10, if it'd been named Red > Hat Linux still. ;-) > > Except for maybe the yum/apt stuff... As I recall, OOo-1.1 was a request from the fedora list that was approved, and not in the original plan. Same with 2.4. GNOME 2.3 was the plan originally, and by request of people on the list (it was then the RHL Project list) the change was made to 2.4 and this delayed the release date by a couple weeks. The point is it was changed by people on this list making a case for it, and people at RH listening to the new community. -- Bill Anderson RHCE #807302597505773 bill@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
