Re: Fedora and the System Administrator -- "have" -> "had"

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Quoting David Jansen <jansen@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>:
> Let's home Fedora Legacy can provide the missing middle road between
> the two existing options.

"Fedora Legacy"???  I'm new here so my ignorance is far fetching (so feel free 
to "smack" me ;-).

> Or some other third-party support service, we will see what the
> future may bring.

In an ideal world, I'd like to see:

Two "Fedora" tags:
  A)  "Bleeding Edge Kernel/GLibC" (like old RHL .0 releases)
  B)  "RHEL Compatible Kernel/GLibC" (not necessarily ABI, but at least API 
compatible)

But I'll settle for any "well integration tested" 'Fedora Core' at this point.  
I'm hoping Red Hat puts enough people on Fedora that we have just that within 6 
months.  I would call that a "success."

Everything else will come with time and effort.  Red Hat can't do it all, but I 
believe they will do all they can to help the community.  They have yet to tell 
me otherwise.

> David (who is also looking into ways to convince work (= university)
> to allocate some budget for RHEL...)

I hear you.  Maybe if things stop working that _might_ get management to free 
up the dough.


-- 
Bryan J. Smith, E.I.  mailto:b.j.smith@xxxxxxxx  http://thebs.org
------------------------------------------------------------------
There is no greater ignorance than the popular American environ-
mental movement, which focuses on the most useless details.  Be it
recycling the world's most renewable resource or refusal to use
proven CFC insulation on launch vehicles, no lives will be spared
in the further pursuit of, ironically, harming the environment.




[Index of Archives]     [Current Fedora Users]     [Fedora Desktop]     [Fedora SELinux]     [Yosemite News]     [Yosemite Photos]     [KDE Users]     [Fedora Tools]     [Fedora Docs]

  Powered by Linux