glibc source rpm and nptl

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

To: fedora-list@xxxxxxxxxx
Subject: glibc source rpm and nptl
From: Rakesh Patel <rapatel@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Fri, 28 Nov 2003 22:30:37 -0500
Reply-to: fedora-list@xxxxxxxxxx
Sender: fedora-list-admin@xxxxxxxxxx
User-agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; Linux i686; en-US; rv:1.5) Gecko/20031007

I was attempting to rebuild glibc from the source rpm and noticed the spec file does not utilize nptl and does not specify it as an addon, but instead uses the linuxthreads addon. The Fedora Core 1 announcements indicate that NPTL is used (and the kernel sources do utilize NPTL). Is the the glibc spec file accurate? I used both the original glibc src rpm and the updated rpm [using the updated binary rpm] and both build without NPTL support.

Is the spec file correct?

Thanks,
Rakesh Patel.

Follow-Ups:
- Re: glibc source rpm and nptl
  - From: Jakub Jelinek

Prev by Date: Prelinking
Next by Date: anyone know where I can get a package containing liblcms.so.1 for fedora
Previous by thread: Prelinking
Next by thread: Re: glibc source rpm and nptl
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread

[Index of Archives] [Current Fedora Users] [Fedora Desktop] [Fedora SELinux] [Yosemite News] [Yosemite Photos] [KDE Users] [Fedora Tools] [Fedora Docs]