Re: Samba and Fedora Core 1

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Wednesday 26 November 2003 10:30, Oliver Kiessler wrote:
> how about the samba issue?
>
> Am Mit, den 26.11.2003 schrieb Gene C. um 15:43:
> > On Tuesday 25 November 2003 18:36, Bill Nottingham wrote:
> > > Jim Cornette ([email protected]) said:
> > > > What major breakthroughs were introduced between RHL9 and the first
> > > > Beta for Fedora that deal with connectivity through the ethernet
> > > > port?
> > >
> > > We keep better track of ethernet devices by tying physical PCI cards
> > > to their hardware address; this is done with ethtool. Apparently
> > > something in kudzu's quick 'load module; query with ethtool ; query
> > > for hardware address' cycle on 3c59x makes the driver/card very
> > > upset. It's not clear at all *why* this is happening, though.
> >
> > I have a system with a 3C905B NIC and FC1 installed and have seen no
> > problems. This may be a problem with only some of the 3C905s.
>
> --
> fedora-list mailing list
> [email protected]
> To unsubscribe: http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-list

Sorry, I do not currently use samba.  I was responding to Bill Nottingham's 
comment about the 3c59x driver and kudzu.
-- 
Gene




[Index of Archives]     [Current Fedora Users]     [Fedora Desktop]     [Fedora SELinux]     [Yosemite News]     [Yosemite Photos]     [KDE Users]     [Fedora Tools]     [Fedora Docs]

  Powered by Linux