Re: Compiling the 2.6 kernel question.

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

To: fedora-list@xxxxxxxxxx
Subject: Re: Compiling the 2.6 kernel question.
From: Xose Vazquez Perez <xose@xxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Mon, 24 Nov 2003 15:20:38 +0100
References: <[email protected]>
Reply-to: fedora-list@xxxxxxxxxx
Sender: fedora-list-admin@xxxxxxxxxx
User-agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; Linux i686; en-US; rv:1.0.1) Gecko/20021003

Elam Daly wrote:

> I'm reading the 2.6 kernel documentation, and I've noticed that it
> requires procps > 3.1.13 and that fedora ships with 2.017.

There are _two_ procps trees.

3.x is maintained by Albert C., mainly for Debian distribution and 2.x
is maintained by linux kernel hackers.

Both of them work ok with 2.6 and 2.4, you only need to get latest releases.

--
HTML mails are going to trash automagically

References:
- Compiling the 2.6 kernel question.
  - From: Elam Daly

Prev by Date: Re:
Next by Date: Re: I think fedora needs...
Previous by thread: Re: Compiling the 2.6 kernel question.
Next by thread: Re: Compiling the 2.6 kernel question.
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread

[Index of Archives] [Current Fedora Users] [Fedora Desktop] [Fedora SELinux] [Yosemite News] [Yosemite Photos] [KDE Users] [Fedora Tools] [Fedora Docs]