On Fri, Nov 21, 2003 at 10:43:42AM -0800, Don wrote: > > Messages without subjects are a point of frustration for a lot of > people. Right up there with "It doesn't work" as a problem > description. > > > > What would it take for the list server to simply reject posts without > a subject back to the sender. That way the "no subject" message never > gets distributed. > > > > It obviously doesn't prevent someone from using "no subject", but if > somebody does that intentionally they deserve to get "no reply" > either. ;-) If you do this, send the culprit a message explaining why the messages is being rejected, and, perhaps, point the culprit to a page on netiquette, such as http://www.charlescurley.com/netiquette.html -- Charles Curley /"\ ASCII Ribbon Campaign Looking for fine software \ / Respect for open standards and/or writing? X No HTML/RTF in email http://www.charlescurley.com / \ No M$ Word docs in email Key fingerprint = CE5C 6645 A45A 64E4 94C0 809C FFF6 4C48 4ECD DFDB
Attachment:
pgp4ZcUBIwPf7.pgp
Description: PGP signature