Re: Future of VPN: CIPE or IPSEC?

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Christians, Stefan Mr. wrote:
So now the big question for us is whether we should migrate our VPN
routers to Fedora Core 1 and convert them to CIPE, or whether we should
wait a few more months until the 2.6 kernel with integrated IPSEC is
included in the standard distribution.

The key question here is whether CIPE will be maintained as a Fedora
Package once the 3.6 kernel is distributed, or whether it will gradually
be phased out. We want to avoid converting to CIPE now and then back to
IPSEC again after a year.

Can any Fedora developer or strategist comment on this?

Why would you want to switch? If IPSEC is working for you and you have already an working infrastructure in place there would be no reason imho to switch.


I personally have been using CIPE and IPSEC over the last couple of years and was pleased with both of them.

But to get to the point: If you have IPSEC up and running, stay with it. It has the certain advantage that it's a real standard (as opposed to CIPE), so integrating new heterogenous systems into your infrastructure will always be easier using IPSEC.

Just my $0.02

Read ya, Phil

--
Philipp Knirsch | Tel.: +49-711-96437-470
Development | Fax.: +49-711-96437-111
Red Hat GmbH | Email: Phil Knirsch <phil@xxxxxxxxx>
Hauptstaetterstr. 58 | Web: http://www.redhat.de/
D-70178 Stuttgart | Motd: Better be root than to reboot. %^)
main(d,o){char **t=o;for(t++,d=o=2e3;--d;o%d?o:--d?d=--o:--**t?d=--o:printf("%d ",o)?*++*t?d=o=2e3:d++:o);}





[Index of Archives]     [Current Fedora Users]     [Fedora Desktop]     [Fedora SELinux]     [Yosemite News]     [Yosemite Photos]     [KDE Users]     [Fedora Tools]     [Fedora Docs]

  Powered by Linux