On Mon, 2003-11-17 at 08:01, Dave Roberts wrote:
Yes, it's back working now. This looks to be a weekend problem. -- Dave On Mon, 2003-11-17 at 07:31, nosp wrote: > On Mon, 2003-11-17 at 14:26, Schlueri wrote: > > Am Mo, den 17.11.2003 schrieb nosp um 15:19: > [...] > > > See: > > > https://listman.redhat.com/archives/fedora-list/2003-November/msg03853.html > > > > I think it's time for an updated up2date package with corrected url's in config file or > > an statement on fedora.redhat.com. Is there no errata site? > > > > This is definitivly a FAQ. > > It's only been about 48 hours, and those 48 were over a weekend. I bet > just about now RH people should be getting to the bottom of all the > "what are the right yum/up2date sources??!?!" emails and sorting out the > problem. If there wasn't a likelihood of situation changing, I'd agree > with you...let's give them a bit of time... > > > -- > fedora-list mailing list > fedora-list@xxxxxxxxxx > http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-list
|
-- Benjamin Arai <benjamin@xxxxxxxxxxxx> Araisoft Corp. |
