-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 On Monday 17 November 2003 15:21, Jason Montleon wrote: > I realize that. But Fernando Fernandez's experience as a newbie to Linux > is not one that should have occured. Everyone would agree with that, but they're Redhat's repos, if they want the jerk them around unannounced that's up to them. There's some tension in Fedora between what's fully under Redhat and what is "community"... interesting to see how it plays out. For example some RH people were blowing gaskets at the ml volume a couple of weeks ago, now there seems to be less RH intervention here, but the ml is ticking along with community input -- obviously less definitive but maybe a sign of both sides adjusting to what the other can bring. Centralized distribution bandwidth is a major thing Redhat give us all for free. It'd be great if there was a Bittorrent-style model for the community reducing that burden on them too, that would ensure 100% availability and no "single point of failure" like the up2date thing. - -Andy -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.2.2 (GNU/Linux) iD8DBQE/uO3wjKeDCxMJCTIRAr2vAJ0W6d2ZvR2cyZw+3L7+wAnTrSWYVACfYnWN /tz5xJTArKxk9VFb3cZXpLs= =rt/Y -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
