Re: trouble with up2date

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1

On Monday 17 November 2003 15:21, Jason Montleon wrote:

> I realize that.  But Fernando Fernandez's experience as a newbie to Linux
> is not one that should have occured.

Everyone would agree with that, but they're Redhat's repos, if they want the 
jerk them around unannounced that's up to them.  There's some tension in 
Fedora between what's fully under Redhat and what is "community"... 
interesting to see how it plays out.  For example some RH people were blowing 
gaskets at the ml volume a couple of weeks ago, now there seems to be less RH 
intervention here, but the ml is ticking along with community input -- 
obviously less definitive but maybe a sign of both sides adjusting to what 
the other can bring.

Centralized distribution bandwidth is a major thing Redhat give us all for 
free.  It'd be great if there was a Bittorrent-style model for the community 
reducing that burden on them too, that would ensure 100% availability and no 
"single point of failure" like the up2date thing.

- -Andy
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.2.2 (GNU/Linux)

iD8DBQE/uO3wjKeDCxMJCTIRAr2vAJ0W6d2ZvR2cyZw+3L7+wAnTrSWYVACfYnWN
/tz5xJTArKxk9VFb3cZXpLs=
=rt/Y
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----




[Index of Archives]     [Current Fedora Users]     [Fedora Desktop]     [Fedora SELinux]     [Yosemite News]     [Yosemite Photos]     [KDE Users]     [Fedora Tools]     [Fedora Docs]

  Powered by Linux