On Fri, 2003-11-14 at 05:58, Nathan G. Grennan wrote: > On Thu, 2003-11-13 at 17:50, Dave Oxley wrote: > > My company is buying a new Dell server (2x2.4GHz P4 Xeon, 2Gb RAM, 73Gb > > RAID 1 SCSI) for our production customer facing web site and I have been > > trying to decide on which Linux distribution to use. It needs to run > > Apache, tomcat, sendmail, mysql, php and bind and have minimum downtime. > > We normally have about 25Gb of HTTP traffic a month, but is likely to > > double over the next 12 months. I am not fussed about having paid for > > support (that's my job!) > > > > I was going to choose RH9 (after deciding against Debian), but I just > > found out about Fedora. Is Core 1 suitable for this type of environment? > > Or would you recommend I go with RH9 or Debian. > > > > Cheers. > > Unlike other replies, I would recommend Fedora Core 1 for servers. I > recently upgraded 10(4 dns, 1 web, 1 mail, 1 backup, 1 monitoring, 1 > misc, 1 dns/web/mail/backup/monitoring) servers from Red Hat 9 to Fedora > Core 1. Did I have problems? Of course. Could it be a little better? > Yes. Did it have bugs similar to those seen with a Red Hat 8.0 to Red > Hat 9 upgrade? Very much so. Is it stable after you get the details > worked out? Yes. Are there quite a few important package upgrades? Yes. > Overall it didn't go as well as I would have liked, but better than I > expected. > you had problems because you updated a RH9 . with fresh install is no problem. > My only concern so far is how much of a mess are updates going to > become. Between security updates currently sitting in testing, potential > messy forced package upgrades, and less than a guarantee from Red Hat > that they will make updated packages available for Fedora Core in a > timely fashion, I am a little worried. > So, for everyone out there : never use a system as it comes ! i personally keep only the core of the OS Dist and after 1 day of working with kernel,grsec,ipsec, and all the new releases of services that i will need (i refer to the home page of every project) ..... !? it will take a long time till you will have to update something or you will be vulnerable. > My analysis of distributions that leaves me with Fedora Core: > > Debian: stable - too old, testing - some packages too old, unstable - > rawhide and still some packages too old > > SuSE: Pay for box set, no isos, ftp install a few months after release, > and hence a No Go. > > Mandrake: Too buggy, seems like complete lack of QA(Sadly RH9 and FC1 > are a little closer to Mandrake than RH7.3 than I would like) > > Gentoo: Shows great promise, install process needs a lot of work, > compiling Everything from source isn't what it is cracked up to be, and > still needs a little more security infrastructure. > > Red Hat 9: Pretty good, but now out of date and updates going away soon > > Red Hat Enterprise 3: Too expensive, too restrictive of a license, and > will in the not too distant future be too out of date. > > > -- > fedora-list mailing list > fedora-list@xxxxxxxxxx > http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-list -- -- George Nasturas Network and System Engineer RDS Vaslui - Network Operations Center Tel: +40-235-314970; Fax: +40-235-314970 ------------------------------------------------------------------------ Privileged/Confidential Information may be contained in this message. If you are not the addressee indicated in this message (or responsible for delivery of the message to such person), you may not copy or deliver this message to anyone. In such a case, you should destroy this message and kindly notify the sender by reply e-mail.
