--- Andy Green <fedora@xxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- > Hash: SHA1 > > On Tuesday 11 November 2003 03:17, Globe Trotter wrote: > > > print. These rpm files use krb5-workstation rpm but the ones that came with > > RH9. If I go with the new one, further down the assembly line, I get the > > search for libcom_err.so.3 and alas, there is nothing!! > > Searching the list archives would have been faster than posting and waiting > for a reply since this was only answered a couple of days ago. make a > symlink to the .so.2 version of the file which you will have, called > ....so.3. > I agree and I did read those posts. But the real import of my question is whether the two are actually the same or is just a hoped-for hack into a problem. In other words, is .so.2 a superset of .so.3? At least the numbering should change then. I was hoping to get what functionality if any is lost by using .so.2 instead of .so.3. Finally, I was always under the impression that an upgrade over 1.0 was backwards compatible -- does not seem to be true for kde5-workstation, does it? Aren't we becoming more like Windoze then? __________________________________ Do you Yahoo!? Protect your identity with Yahoo! Mail AddressGuard http://antispam.yahoo.com/whatsnewfree
