Re: 3rd party compatibility (was: Freshrpms.net concerns.)

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Mon, 10 Nov 2003, Jerry A! wrote:

> On Mon, Nov 10, 2003 at 05:58:01AM +0100, Dag Wieers wrote:
> : On 8 Nov 2003, Florin Andrei wrote:
> : 
> : > On Sat, 2003-11-08 at 12:41, Marc Williams wrote:
> : > > 
> : > > I *think* that ATrpms, Freshrpms, Dag, and a few others collude so as to
> : > > make these sorts of conflicts unlikely.
> : > 
> : > Wouldn't it be great if all these projects will start to co-ordinate
> : > with each other somehow? To not re-invent the whell and all that...
> : 
> : Well, the 4 repositories (atrpms, dag, freshrpms and newrpms) already 
> : stopped creating duplicate packages and working on compatibility.
> : 
> : Having one merged repository is something we plan to do, but since the 
> : compatibility is there already there's no real pressure.
> 
> Are there any plans to make these repositories yum enabled?

They are Yum enabled ;)

--   dag wieers,  [email protected],  http://dag.wieers.com/   --
[Any errors in spelling, tact or fact are transmission errors]




[Index of Archives]     [Current Fedora Users]     [Fedora Desktop]     [Fedora SELinux]     [Yosemite News]     [Yosemite Photos]     [KDE Users]     [Fedora Tools]     [Fedora Docs]

  Powered by Linux