Re: GPG signatures

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Tue, Dec 30, 2003 at 11:31:00AM -0500, Sean Estabrooks typed in a frenzy:
> The number of reasons to impersonate anyone on a public help list is 
> so small that it leads me to believe that the people signing messages
> are more interested in playing with it as a toy rather than avoiding 
> any risk to themselves.
> 
> Sean

It may lead you to that conclusion, but there are clients that do in
fact automatically sign messages. So in that case, I'd say this
assumption is half baked at best. When using mutt I don't sign
my messages automatically, but if I use sylpheed, it does sign
messages automatically. I prefer this method for *me* because I do not
necessarily send vital information away from home. But if I do I -can-
sign it quite easily. Not that this is a federal case or anything,
I just would hate for the idea to crop up that people signing messages
around here are doing so just because they can, or because they are
fiddling with it. 

Personally I did all my fiddling with it back in 1999 and some of 
2000/2001,I accidentally exported like 6 keys to the servers 
"just playing with it." Yeah that was my bad. But, now I know how the
frickin' application functions and what purposes it serves. So now I
feel all guilty for just makin' keys to be making them. I suppose at
this point, can't do much about it.

Yeah it really pays off to ignore that warning "Don't send keys unless
you're familiar with how gpg works." Maybe this entire response is just
a way for me to get that off my chest lol Who knows. I need more soda.

Be Cool and Stay Live

Alex
 
-- 
If you understand, things are just as they are; if you do not 
understand, things are just as they are. --Spoken in Zen




[Index of Archives]     [Current Fedora Users]     [Fedora Desktop]     [Fedora SELinux]     [Yosemite News]     [Yosemite Photos]     [KDE Users]     [Fedora Tools]     [Fedora Docs]

  Powered by Linux