Hi Phil,
I can appreciate where you are coming from, however, I don't have the luxury or time to download
files every day to keep up with a stable version of FC 1. From what I see here FC 1 should have
waited 6 months before release to work out the kinks that we seem to be having.
I have applications that I need to run on FC 1 and they don't. Either linking problems or assembly
problems. I just want to start with something more stable that is all. And besides I did pay for someone
to ship me FC 1 so I am not completely taking.
Chris
Randal, Phil wrote:
That'll do you till the end of April 2004, and then what?
You could instead stay with FC1, feeding back problem reports to the developers, so that when FC2 comes out in April it will be a better product.
Open Source is about give and take, not just take.
Cheers,
Phil
---------------------------------------------
Phil Randal
Network Engineer
Herefordshire Council
Hereford, UK
-----Original Message----- From: fedora-list-admin@xxxxxxxxxx [mailto:fedora-list-admin@xxxxxxxxxx]On Behalf Of Chris Sparks Sent: 19 December 2003 00:50 To: fedora-list@xxxxxxxxxx Subject: Re: RH 9.0
Hi everyone,
I have been considering going back to RH 9.0 since Fedora is too volatile to work with.
Is there any technical problems with 9.0 that I need to be aware of?
Chris
-- fedora-list mailing list fedora-list@xxxxxxxxxx To unsubscribe: http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-list
-- fedora-list mailing list fedora-list@xxxxxxxxxx To unsubscribe: http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-list
