> From: "Preston Crawford" <me@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> > To: fedora-list@xxxxxxxxxx > Subject: Re: how bleeding edge will the next fedora release be? > Date: Wed, 10 Dec 2003 14:14:07 -0700 > Reply-To: fedora-list@xxxxxxxxxx > > ----- Original Message ----- > From: Karl DeBisschop > Sent: 12/10/2003 2:11:41 PM > To: fedora-list@xxxxxxxxxx > Subject: Re: how bleeding edge will the next fedora release be? > > > My take on it is that FC2 will be as stable as you want it to be. If you > > 'pay' for the release by testing during the development cycle it will be > > more stable than if you sit on the sidelines expecting enterprise > > stability for no cost. > > It's funny that you use the term "pay" since many of us would be happy > to pay actual money if the terms weren't constantly shifting. I'd > gladly pay for a relatively stable for Fedora. But the only way I > can pay is by being a beta tester? You can pay for RHEL. I too would prefer to pay for Fedora. But that's not what RedHat is offering at the moment. But that's a RH corporate issue, so I won't pretend to speak for them. > Preston Not to be harsh, but if you turned the line wrap on your MUA to a reasonable level, I would not need to manually wrap the digest every time I replied to one of your messages. Say 72 characters? -- Karl DeBisschop <kdebisschop@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> Pearson Education/Information Please
