Re: how bleeding edge will the next fedora release be?

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



> From: "Preston Crawford" <me@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> To: fedora-list@xxxxxxxxxx
> Subject: Re: how bleeding edge will the next fedora release be?
> Date: Wed, 10 Dec 2003 14:14:07 -0700
> Reply-To: fedora-list@xxxxxxxxxx
> 
> ----- Original Message -----
> From: Karl DeBisschop
> Sent: 12/10/2003 2:11:41 PM
> To: fedora-list@xxxxxxxxxx
> Subject: Re: how bleeding edge will the next fedora release be?
> 
> > My take on it is that FC2 will be as stable as you want it to be. If you
> > 'pay' for the release by testing during the development cycle it will be
> > more stable than if you sit on the sidelines expecting enterprise
> > stability for no cost.
> 
> It's funny that you use the term "pay" since many of us would be happy
> to pay actual money if the terms weren't constantly shifting. I'd
> gladly pay for a relatively stable for Fedora. But the only way I
> can pay is by being a beta tester?

You can pay for RHEL.

I too would prefer to pay for Fedora. But that's not what RedHat is
offering at the moment.

But that's a RH corporate issue, so I won't pretend to speak for them.

> Preston

Not to be harsh, but if you turned the line wrap on your MUA to a
reasonable level, I would not need to manually wrap the digest every
time I replied to one of your messages. Say 72 characters?

-- 
Karl DeBisschop <kdebisschop@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Pearson Education/Information Please




[Index of Archives]     [Current Fedora Users]     [Fedora Desktop]     [Fedora SELinux]     [Yosemite News]     [Yosemite Photos]     [KDE Users]     [Fedora Tools]     [Fedora Docs]

  Powered by Linux