On Tue, 2003-12-09 at 09:39, Michael Gargiullo wrote: > On Tue, 2003-12-09 at 09:23, Alexandre Oliva wrote: > > On Dec 9, 2003, Hans M 1/4ller ndof@xxxxxxx> wrote: > > > > > raid 10 when 1 disk in the raid1 and 1 disk in the raid0 part fail > > > > This claim doesn't make sense. There's no such thing as the raid1 > > and raid0 parts. RAID 10 is a RAID 0 array built atop of a collection > > of RAID 1 arrays. > > I always thought that RAID 10 was just a mirrored RAID 0 set. No, that's RAID01. RAID10 is N mirrored pairs (N RAID1 sets) striped together into a RAID0 set. Art S. Kagel
