On Sun, Aug 17, 2003 at 11:27:50AM +0100, Lance Davis wrote: > I think that you are wrong there, Redhat have used trademark law to > prevent the distribution of 100% GPL code, and have restricted the rights > under the GPL of someone who has purchased a GPL product to redistribute > it. The CD contains software under many different non-GPL open source licenses, so can't be described as "100% GPL." Even if the software were all GPL, the GPL is explicit that this does not impact logo images found on the CD: In addition, mere aggregation of another work not based on the Program with the Program (or with a work based on the Program) on a volume of a storage or distribution medium does not bring the other work under the scope of this License. There is a separate license in the redhat-logos and anaconda-images packages. See /usr/share/doc/redhat-logos-(version)/COPYING for example. I am not a lawyer or official spokesperson and you should consult both for a reliable interpretation. Havoc
