Re: [PATCH] Force UNIX domain sockets to be built in

> I'd say the practical advantage to the user would be almost zero.
> Which distribution is going to enable this option and defacto
> banning external modules?

It would be a real nuisance for developing code let alone for using it.
The entries are currently far bigger than is needed and fixing that would
be much more productive.

Alan
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [email protected]
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

Follow-Ups:
- Re: [PATCH] Force UNIX domain sockets to be built in
  - From: "Torsten Kaiser" <[email protected]>

References:
- [PATCH] Force UNIX domain sockets to be built in
  - From: Bodo Eggert <[email protected]>
- Re: [PATCH] Force UNIX domain sockets to be built in
  - From: Adrian Bunk <[email protected]>
- Re: [PATCH] Force UNIX domain sockets to be built in
  - From: "Torsten Kaiser" <[email protected]>
- Re: [PATCH] Force UNIX domain sockets to be built in
  - From: Michael Buesch <[email protected]>

Prev by Date: Re: [PATCH] x86: provide a DMI based port 0x80 I/O delay override
Next by Date: Re: Recursive variable `KBUILD_CFLAGS' references itself (eventually).
Previous by thread: Re: [PATCH] Force UNIX domain sockets to be built in
Next by thread: Re: [PATCH] Force UNIX domain sockets to be built in
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread

[Index of Archives] [Kernel Newbies] [Netfilter] [Bugtraq] [Photo] [Stuff] [Gimp] [Yosemite News] [MIPS Linux] [ARM Linux] [Linux Security] [Linux RAID] [Video 4 Linux] [Linux for the blind] [Linux Resources]