Re: [PATCH] x86: provide a DMI based port 0x80 I/O delay override

["H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@zytor.com>]

Juergen Beisert wrote:
> On Sunday 30 December 2007 16:38, Alan Cox wrote:
> > > do you have any memories about the outb_p() use of misc_32.c:
> > >
> > >         pos = (x + cols * y) * 2;       /* Update cursor position */
> > >         outb_p(14, vidport);
> > >         outb_p(0xff & (pos >> 9), vidport+1);
> > >         outb_p(15, vidport);
> > >         outb_p(0xff & (pos >> 1), vidport+1);
> > >
> > > was this ever needed? This is so early in the bootup that can we cannot
> > None - but we don't care.
>
> Was this embedded outb to 0x80 for delay only? Maybe I'm wrong. But in the 
> case above it forces the chipselect signal to deselect the hardware between 
> the access to vidport and vidport+1. Some devices need this to latch the 
> values correctly. Otherwise the chipselect signal would be active for all 
> four accesses in the example above (and only data and addresses are changing 
> from device's view).

Presumably you're talking about an actual ISA bus here.  On those, you 
don't really have a chip select; but you'd expect the latch to happen on 
the rising edge of IOW#, not on an internally generated chip select.

Now, I think there is a specific reason to believe that EGA/VGA (but 
perhaps not CGA/MDA) didn't need these kinds of hacks: the video cards 
of the day was touched, directly, by an interminable number of DOS 
applications.  CGA/MDA generally *were not*, due to the unsynchronized 
memory of the original versions (writing could cause snow), so most 
applications tended to fall back to using the BIOS access methods for 
CGA and MDA.

	-hpa
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/