> A 2.6.26 plan for io_delay=none is very very foolish indeed. We don't burn It also seems quite risky to me; at least if not paired with a DMI year master switch. Switching to udelay() by default should be probably ok though. -Andi -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to [email protected] More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
- References:
- [PATCH] x86: provide a DMI based port 0x80 I/O delay override
- From: Rene Herman <[email protected]>
- Re: [PATCH] x86: provide a DMI based port 0x80 I/O delay override
- From: Linus Torvalds <[email protected]>
- Re: [PATCH] x86: provide a DMI based port 0x80 I/O delay override
- From: Alan Cox <[email protected]>
- Re: [PATCH] x86: provide a DMI based port 0x80 I/O delay override
- From: Ingo Molnar <[email protected]>
- Re: [PATCH] x86: provide a DMI based port 0x80 I/O delay override
- From: Rene Herman <[email protected]>
- Re: [PATCH] x86: provide a DMI based port 0x80 I/O delay override
- From: Ingo Molnar <[email protected]>
- Re: [PATCH] x86: provide a DMI based port 0x80 I/O delay override
- From: Rene Herman <[email protected]>
- Re: [PATCH] x86: provide a DMI based port 0x80 I/O delay override
- From: Ingo Molnar <[email protected]>
- Re: [PATCH] x86: provide a DMI based port 0x80 I/O delay override
- From: Alan Cox <[email protected]>
- [PATCH] x86: provide a DMI based port 0x80 I/O delay override
- Prev by Date: Re: [PATCH] AMD Thermal Interrupt Support
- Next by Date: Re: [PATCH] x86: provide a DMI based port 0x80 I/O delay override
- Previous by thread: Re: [PATCH] x86: provide a DMI based port 0x80 I/O delay override
- Next by thread: Re: [PATCH] x86: provide a DMI based port 0x80 I/O delay override
- Index(es):
 |