* Ingo Molnar <[email protected]> wrote:
> > Combine the 32 and 64 bit specific Makefiles in one file. While
> > doing so link order was (almost) preserved on 32 bit but on 64 bit
> > link order changed a lot.
> >
> > Patch was checked with defconfig + allyesconfig builds. The same .o
> > files were linked in these configurations.
> >
> > To keep readability of the Makefiles a few Kconfig symbols was
> > added/modified and it was checked that they were not used anywhere
> > else.
>
> hm, i agree with this change, but would it be possible to split this
> up into gradual steps, to change the rules on 64-bit one by one? That
> would make it much more bisectable. In our experience changes to the
> link order have a high likelyhood of breaking stuff, as we've got so
> many implicit initcall dependencies that are not explicitly spelled
> out.
i've added your full patch meanwhile - maybe we can get away with it.
Still, if you see any easy way to do a straightforward series of ~40
patches that changes one link rule per patch then that would be great
and we could add them as an easier-to-bisect replacement for this one
large-scope patch.
Ingo
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [email protected]
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
[Index of Archives]
[Kernel Newbies]
[Netfilter]
[Bugtraq]
[Photo]
[Stuff]
[Gimp]
[Yosemite News]
[MIPS Linux]
[ARM Linux]
[Linux Security]
[Linux RAID]
[Video 4 Linux]
[Linux for the blind]
[Linux Resources]
