* Julia Lawall <[email protected]> wrote:
> On Mon, 24 Dec 2007, Andi Kleen wrote:
>
> > On Mon, Dec 24, 2007 at 03:23:19PM +0100, Julia Lawall wrote:
> > > From: Julia Lawall <[email protected]>
> > >
> > > The functions time_before, time_before_eq, time_after, and time_after_eq
> > > are more robust for comparing jiffies against other values.
> >
> > The old code was actually correct I think, but the change is ok for me.
>
> Please ignore the patch. All of my before_eq and after_eq's are
> backwards due to parsing <= as >= and vice versa. I will try again.
your x86 patches (#7, #8 and #9) do not include any *_eq() comparisons
and they all seem to be correct. So picked those three up into x86.git -
let me know if there's any breakage in them that i missed.
Ingo
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [email protected]
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
[Index of Archives]
[Kernel Newbies]
[Netfilter]
[Bugtraq]
[Photo]
[Stuff]
[Gimp]
[Yosemite News]
[MIPS Linux]
[ARM Linux]
[Linux Security]
[Linux RAID]
[Video 4 Linux]
[Linux for the blind]
[Linux Resources]