Re: [PATCH] x86: provide a DMI based port 0x80 I/O delay override

* Andi Kleen <[email protected]> wrote:

> > drivers that then are shown to really need it could use their *own* 
> > ports.
> 
> The i8259 driver uses it and it is known to be needed on some old 
> chipsets. But it doesn't really have any "own" ports to use afaik.

we'll solve that via an i8259-specific quirk. That is a lot cleaner and 
maintainable than the current generic, always-enabled "opt out" 
port-0x80 quirk.

	Ingo
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [email protected]
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

Follow-Ups:
- Re: [PATCH] x86: provide a DMI based port 0x80 I/O delay override
  - From: Andi Kleen <[email protected]>

References:
- [PATCH] x86: provide a DMI based port 0x80 I/O delay override
  - From: Rene Herman <[email protected]>
- Re: [PATCH] x86: provide a DMI based port 0x80 I/O delay override
  - From: Linus Torvalds <[email protected]>
- Re: [PATCH] x86: provide a DMI based port 0x80 I/O delay override
  - From: Andi Kleen <[email protected]>

Prev by Date: Re: [PATCH] x86: provide a DMI based port 0x80 I/O delay override
Next by Date: Re: [PATCH] Hibernation: Document __save_processor_state() on x86-64
Previous by thread: Re: [PATCH] x86: provide a DMI based port 0x80 I/O delay override
Next by thread: Re: [PATCH] x86: provide a DMI based port 0x80 I/O delay override
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread

[Index of Archives] [Kernel Newbies] [Netfilter] [Bugtraq] [Photo] [Stuff] [Gimp] [Yosemite News] [MIPS Linux] [ARM Linux] [Linux Security] [Linux RAID] [Video 4 Linux] [Linux for the blind] [Linux Resources]