Re: [PATCH 03/12] firewire : Use mutex instead of semaphore in driver core

Dave Young wrote:
> --- linux/drivers/firewire/fw-device.c	2007-12-28 10:02:38.000000000 +0800
> +++ linux.new/drivers/firewire/fw-device.c	2007-12-28 10:05:00.000000000 +0800
> @@ -26,7 +26,7 @@
>  #include <linux/delay.h>
>  #include <linux/idr.h>
>  #include <linux/rwsem.h>
> -#include <asm/semaphore.h>
> +#include <linux/mutex.h>
>  #include <linux/ctype.h>
>  #include "fw-transaction.h"
>  #include "fw-topology.h"
> @@ -731,9 +731,9 @@ static int update_unit(struct device *de
>  	struct fw_driver *driver = (struct fw_driver *)dev->driver;
>  
>  	if (is_fw_unit(dev) && driver != NULL && driver->update != NULL) {
> -		down(&dev->sem);
> +		mutex_lock(&dev->mutex);
>  		driver->update(unit);
> -		up(&dev->sem);
> +		mutex_unlock(&dev->mutex);
>  	}
>  
>  	return 0;

ACK to this part of the series.
-- 
Stefan Richter
-=====-=-=== ==-- ===-=
http://arcgraph.de/sr/
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [email protected]
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

---

• References:
  • [PATCH 03/12] firewire : Use mutex instead of semaphore in driver core
    • From: Dave Young <[email protected]>

• Prev by Date: Re: [PATCH 06/12] pci : Use mutex instead of semaphore in driver core
• Next by Date: Re: [PATCH 05/12] ieee1394 : Use mutex instead of semaphore in driver core
• Previous by thread: [PATCH 03/12] firewire : Use mutex instead of semaphore in driver core
• Next by thread: [PATCH 04/12] i2c : Use mutex instead of semaphore in driver core
• Index(es):
  • Date
  • Thread

[Index of Archives]     [Kernel Newbies]     [Netfilter]     [Bugtraq]     [Photo]     [Stuff]     [Gimp]     [Yosemite News]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Video 4 Linux]     [Linux for the blind]     [Linux Resources]