Re: [PATCH] x86: unify x86 Makefile(s)

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Friday 28 December 2007 23:13:24 Adrian Bunk wrote:
> On Fri, Dec 28, 2007 at 10:23:41PM +0100, Sam Ravnborg wrote:
> >...
> > Noteworthy remarks on the unification:
> >...
> > - -funit-at-a-time should be easy to unify but it looks like we have a bug
> >   in 32 bit. We only enable -funit-at-a-time for gcc less than 0400 if they
> >   support it
> 
> No, we _dis_able it on 32bit if a gcc < 4.0 supports it.
> 
> > (and I recall it is a gcc 4.00 feature). [-lt -> -gt]
> >...
> 
> unit-at-a-time was introduced in upstream gcc 3.4 and backported to some 
> popular 3.3 x86_64 branch.
> 
> i386 and x86_64 go in exactly opposite directions regarding when to use 
> unit-at-a-time, but that was intentional and we should keep it that way.

i386 disabled it because there were claims that it increased stack size
too much, but I haven't seen any real evidence for that. That is why I never
added it to x86-64. On the other hand it tends to shrink text size considerably.

I think it should be reevaluated and enabled by default on i386 again.

BTW there is a patch pending for gcc 4.3+ that prevents optimizations
that increase stack size unduly. Not sure it has been added there yet,
but that was the right fix for these problems anyways.

-Andi


--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [email protected]
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

[Index of Archives]     [Kernel Newbies]     [Netfilter]     [Bugtraq]     [Photo]     [Stuff]     [Gimp]     [Yosemite News]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Video 4 Linux]     [Linux for the blind]     [Linux Resources]
  Powered by Linux