On Sat, 29 Dec 2007 01:58:44 +0100, "=?ISO-8859-1?Q?Oliver_Pinter_(Pint=E9r_Oliv=E9r)?=" said: > sure, but to 2.6.22 or 2.6.23-rcX (with merged the cfs scheduler) > don't show this warnings, but the CONFIG_DEBUG_STACK_USAGE is enabled. > And I look in your dmesg-2.6.24-rc6-wifi0, and I see in the last 15 lines or so: Write protecting the kernel text: 3528k Write protecting the kernel read-only data: 890k khelper used greatest stack depth: 6328 bytes left stty used greatest stack depth: 6180 bytes left mount used greatest stack depth: 6156 bytes left mknod used greatest stack depth: 5932 bytes left Adding 2048276k swap on /dev/sda2. Priority:-1 extents:1 across:2048276k XFS mounting filesystem sda1 Ending clean XFS mount for filesystem: sda1 XFS mounting filesystem sda4 Ending clean XFS mount for filesystem: sda4 skge eth0: enabling interface ADDRCONF(NETDEV_UP): eth0: link is not ready wpa_supplicant used greatest stack depth: 5740 bytes left eth1: no IPv6 routers present dhclient3 used greatest stack depth: 5500 bytes left So what message are you saying you don't see? I see a bunch of "used greatest stack" messages there?
Attachment:
pgpWdhnkOsS0o.pgp
Description: PGP signature
- References:
- [2.6.23(?)=<] X used greatest stack depth: N bytes left
- From: "Oliver Pinter (Pintér Olivér)" <[email protected]>
- Re: [2.6.23(?)=<] X used greatest stack depth: N bytes left
- From: Randy Dunlap <[email protected]>
- [2.6.23(?)=<] X used greatest stack depth: N bytes left
- From: "Oliver Pinter (Pintér Olivér)" <[email protected]>
- [2.6.23(?)=<] X used greatest stack depth: N bytes left
- Prev by Date: Re: Corrupted Hard Drive after activating intel I/oat dma
- Next by Date: Re: [PATCH] jfs: clear PAGECACHE_TAG_DIRTY for no-write pages
- Previous by thread: Re: [2.6.23(?)=<] X used greatest stack depth: N bytes left
- Next by thread: [PATCH] x86: unify x86 Makefile(s)
- Index(es):
 |