>
> Mike, what's going on? I definitely told you last time I
> looked at this patch that it is a bug to call
> sysfs_remove_group() under spinlock, because
> sysfs_remove_group() takes sleeping locks. Yet here it is again.
>
> Maybe you lost my email. It is here:
> http://lkml.org/lkml/2007/11/20/77
>
>
> Also please see http://lkml.org/lkml/2007/11/20/79
>
Andrew,
My apologies. Obviously I did not read your email closely. When I return from vacation I will address these issues.
-- mikem
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [email protected]
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
[Index of Archives]
[Kernel Newbies]
[Netfilter]
[Bugtraq]
[Photo]
[Stuff]
[Gimp]
[Yosemite News]
[MIPS Linux]
[ARM Linux]
[Linux Security]
[Linux RAID]
[Video 4 Linux]
[Linux for the blind]
[Linux Resources]
