On Thu, Dec 27, 2007 at 10:33:13AM +0800, Huang, Ying wrote:
> On Wed, 2007-12-26 at 20:57 -0500, Vivek Goyal wrote:
> [...]
> > > 9. Now, you are in the original kernel again. You can read/write the
> > > memory image of kexeced kernel via /proc/kimgcore.
> > >
> >
> > Why do we need two interfaces, /proc/vmcore and /proc/kimgcore? Can't
> > we have just one say /proc/vmcore. Irrespective of what kernel you are
> > in /proc/vmcore gives you the access to the memory of kernel which was
> > previously booted.
>
> In theory we can kexec another kernel even in a kexeced kernel, that is,
> in kernel A kexec kernel B, and in kernel B kexec another kernel C. In
> this situation, both /proc/vmcore and /proc/kimgcore has valid contents.
> So I think, it may be better to keep two interfaces.
>
In those situations I think only one interface is better. For example,
above will be broken if somebody kexec 4 kernels.
A-->B--->C--->D
I think better option might be if it is stack like situation. A kernel
shows you only the previous kernel's memory contents through /proc/vmcore
interface. So If I am in kernel D, I see only kernel C's memory image.
To see kernel B's memory image, one shall have to go back to kernel C.
Thanks
Vivek
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [email protected]
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
[Index of Archives]
[Kernel Newbies]
[Netfilter]
[Bugtraq]
[Photo]
[Stuff]
[Gimp]
[Yosemite News]
[MIPS Linux]
[ARM Linux]
[Linux Security]
[Linux RAID]
[Video 4 Linux]
[Linux for the blind]
[Linux Resources]
